Re: NEC-LIST: Antenna patents

From: M. Pender <michael.pender_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:58:08 -0800 (PST)

-----Original Message-----
From: nec-list-admin_at_gweep.ca [mailto:nec-list-admin_at_gweep.ca]On Behalf
Of EVonvaltie_at_aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 3:20 PM
To: nec-list_at_gweep.ca
Subject: NEC-LIST: Antenna patents

> I disagree with most of the comments about patents. I have personally
> been granted a number of patents, most of which I was able to financially
> benefit from (beyond the legal fees.) In my experience, most people do
> not understand the subtleties of our patent system. The common belief is
> that every idea with a bit of ingenuity involved is patent worthy. In
> fact, the real criterion for patentability is 'novelty', a somewhat more
> intricate concept.

How did you benefit from the patents? Did you license the antenna
technology to another company?

- Mike

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
Received on Mon Feb 02 2004 - 20:59:31 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:44 EDT