Re: NEC-LIST: CFA and the Hately advertisement

From: Prof Duncan Baker <dbaker_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 15:49:40 +0200

Hi all.

Jos is of course quite right, but I guess that I am being very tongue
in cheek with "the higher the better.".

Strictly speaking though, his point is taken. It would also appear
that there are many of us who still remain very sceptical of the
performance claims for the CFA.

If memory serves me right, some operators at HF prefer to use a
so-called 190 degree mast (little over 0.5 lambda), in order to reduce
the skywave component and to increase the ground range before one gets
interference between sky- and groundwave at night. I do recall an
article where the authors described a means of using toploading with
stay wires (insulated) to get comparable results to the 190 degree
tower with a 90 degree (lambda over 4) tower. The details are lost in
my filing cabinets somewhere.

Have a great day, all of you.

Duncan.

--
***************************************************************
Prof. Duncan C. Baker (Pr. Eng., FIEEE, FSAIEE)
Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Eng.,
University of Pretoria, 0002 Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA.
Editor, IEEE Region 8 News.
R8 Homepage - http://www.ewh.ieee.org/reg/8/  or
   http://www.ieee.org/regional/r8/
PHONE +27 12 420 2775 (OFFICE), +27 12 361 7480  (HOME)
FAX   +27 12 362 5000 (OFFICE),  +27 12 348 5314 (HOME)
E-MAIL: dbaker_at_postino.up.ac.za (PREFERRED ADDRESS)
        IEEE alias address: duncan.baker_at_ieee.org
 Private server address:  apc_at_acenet.co.za
LOCAL STANDARD TIME = UT+2 HOURS
****************************************************************
Received on Fri May 21 1999 - 16:40:41 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:39 EDT