NEC-LIST: Re-radiation and the CFA

If one believes that the claimed beneficial performance of the CFA is
really the result of re-radiation from a remote tower or the mounting
structure, wouldn't it also be necessary that one concede the fact
that the CFA had to first radiate the power? From where else would
the radiated power have come? Re-radiation can only change the
pattern shape, it can not generate more power. ...unless, of course,
we advocate that the mounting structure is the real perpetual motion
machine????

I enjoy (and learn from) your comments. Please keep them coming,
thank you.

Best regards to all,
J.L. Smith
jlsmith_at_datasync.com
Received on Fri May 21 1999 - 16:47:24 EDT