RE: NEC-LIST: Negative resistance?

From: Packer, Malcolm <MPacker_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:08:00 -0500

Try this, some segment issues in your input file.

CM sailing1 dipol balun Z0=136 ohm and support
CM EAM-NEC v2.2a March 1997 mjp
CE 0 0 0.30 0.001000 60.00 30.00 15.00 15.00 0.00
GW 1 11 0.00000 0.00000 0.03750 0.00000 0.00000 -0.03750
0.00175
GW 2 10 0.00000 0.00000 0.00341 0.00000 -0.03000 0.00333
0.00175
GW 3 10 0.00000 0.00000 -0.00341 0.00000 -0.03000 -0.00333
0.00175
GW 4 1 0.00000 -0.03000 0.00333 0.00000 -0.03000 -0.00333
0.00175
GW 4 4 0.00000 -0.03000 0.00333 0.00000 -0.03000 0.03000
0.00175
GW 4 4 0.00000 -0.03000 -0.00333 0.00000 -0.03000 -0.03000
0.00175
GE 0
FR 0 1 0 0 2.00E+03 1.00E+01 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.00E+00
EX 0 1 6 0 1.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.00E+00
RP 0 1 361 1001 9.00E+01 0.00E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E+00 0.00E+00
0.00E+00
EN

Malcolm Packer
Electromagnetic Scientist
RF Communications
Harris Corporation
mpacker_at_harris.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Fuks [mailto:peter_at_tet.kth.se]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 5:11 AM
To: nec-list_at_ee.ubc.ca
Subject: NEC-LIST: Negative resistance?

The attached listing which describes a half-wave dipole with some
supporting structure generates negative resistance. Do we have a
solution to the energy crisis?

Any comments or explanations are most welcome.

CM sailing1 dipol balun Z0=136 ohm and support
CE
GW 1 19 0.0 0.0 0.0375 0.0 0.0 -0.0375 0.00175
GW 2 10 0.0 0.0 0.003 0.0 -0.03 0.003 0.00175
GW 3 10 0.0 0.0 -0.003 0.0 -0.03 -0.003 0.00175
GW 4 5 0.0 -0.03 0.03 0.0 -0.03 -0.03 0.00175
GE 0
FR 0 1 0 0 2000 10.0000 0.00E+00
EX 0 1 10 0 1.00E+00 0.00E+00
RP 0 1 360 1001 90.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.00E+00
EN

take care,

Peter.
Received on Sun Feb 27 2000 - 06:25:59 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:40 EDT