Re: NEC-LIST:The conductivity of wire segments when modelling a person?

From: Jim Lux <James.P.Lux_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:14:17 -0800

Humans are pretty good conductors.. use numbers corresponding to salt
water.. If you look for data used in SAR (specific absorption rate) for cell
phones it will be pretty close (800 MHz and 144 MHz aren't all that far
apart..). Off hand, I don't know how you would properly scale a bulk
property (like conductivity and epsilon) to a sheet, but you could figure
the skin depth, and figure out the sheet "resistance per square" and then
match that with your wires.

----- Original Message -----
From: "jianxu" <jianxu_at_ee.ualberta.ca>
To: <4nec2_at_gmx.net>; "nec-list" <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: NEC-LIST:The conductivity of wire segments when modelling a person?

> Hi all,
>
> Thank you for your reply about how to model a person using
> wire segments. Most people concentrated on how to model the
> shape but I find that the conductivity of wire segments are
> more sensitive when the "person" interacts with 2 meter wave
> in near field. I just have no idea what RLC values or sheath
> of wire segments should be used here to provide accurate
> simulations.
>
> Jian
> --
> The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
Received on Wed Nov 13 2002 - 21:12:14 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:42 EDT