Re: NEC-LIST: Zero-Q antenna

From: Joe Jahoda <jjahoda_at_email.domain.hidden>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:00:18 -0500

Has anyone requested that the Grimes comment on Ed's excellent comments?
Joe Jahoda

----- Original Message -----
From: <Fractenna_at_aol.com>
To: <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: NEC-LIST: Zero-Q antenna

> In a message dated 1/22/03 7:02:33 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> alan.boswell_at_baesystems.com writes:
>
> > Edward
> > Thank you for the reply. All replies so far have been negative towards
the
> > Grimes &Grimes work. Is there anybody on the list who thinks their
results
> > are right?
> > Alan
> >
> >
>
> I suspect far fewer of us have seen the work than heard of it.
>
> More important than some theoretical construct is the realization of that
> construct. I am not aware of any extant zero-Q antenna--whether measured
by
> some NIST standard or by a bunch of physicists being resourceful with
> resources at hand.
>
> 73,
> Chip N1IR
> --
> The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
> http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
>

-- 
The NEC-List mailing list <nec-list_at_gweep.ca>
http://www.gweep.ca/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nec-list
Received on Wed Jan 22 2003 - 14:59:18 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:10:44 EDT